Deliverable one
One-page strategy summary
For chairs who need the gist before the detail.
AI strategy consulting UK
AI strategy consulting grounded in operations
A useful AI strategy is not a slide deck about the future. It is a decision framework for what to build, buy, pause, and measure now — with the documents a board can actually approve.
- Output
- Roadmap, governance memo, 30/60/90 plan
- Audience
- Boards, MDs, and leadership teams
- Sprint length
- One to two weeks core, longer where due diligence is material
- Posture
- Vendor-neutral, evidence-led
Good fit when
For boards that need a decision framework, not a future-state deck.
A useful strategy sprint gives leadership the language, evidence, and documents to decide what to build, buy, defer, govern, and measure.
- Current situation
A board decision is coming
CEOs, sponsors, and investors need a defensible AI plan in the next board cycle.
- What we help with
Roadmap, governance, and build-vs-buy choices
The sprint turns contested ideas into a ranked plan with owners, risks, and first-90-days actions.
- Common concern
Will strategy detach from delivery?
Recommendations are scored against workflows, data, vendor exposure, and delivery constraints.
What you leave with
Strategy you can table, defend, and act on.
These are the deliverables we hand over by the end of a strategy sprint — what a non-technical board chair needs to make a defensible AI decision.
Deliverable two
Build-vs-buy register
Each capability mapped to build, buy, partner, or defer — with rationale.
Deliverable three
Governance memo
Data boundaries, accountability, model and vendor exposure, escalation paths.
Deliverable four
30/60/90 execution plan
Sequenced moves with owners, dependencies, and measurement.
Three engagements at boardroom scale
How a strategy sprint lands in different boards.
Composite engagements, anonymised but representative of the shape of work and the room it ends up in.
Healthcare services group
A 12-month AI roadmap a board would actually approve
A healthcare services group needed an AI plan the board could approve at the next quarterly. The chief exec had ideas. The finance director had concerns. The IT lead had a stalled pilot.
What we'd ship
A 12-month sequenced roadmap with three quarterly milestones, a governance memo covering patient-data exposure, and a build-vs-buy register that gave the finance director numbers she could stand behind.
Timeline·Two weeks discovery, one week to board pack
Growing software firm
Build-vs-buy across five contested workflows
A growing SaaS firm had product, ops, and CS each pushing for an AI capability. Engineering capacity was the bottleneck. Leadership needed help sequencing.
What we'd ship
A workflow-by-workflow build-vs-buy register with sequencing rationale, vendor shortlist, and an internal-capacity calendar. The CTO got cover; the CS leader got their tooling first; the product team waited the right amount.
Timeline·One week discovery, two weeks recommendation
Established services firm
A three-year AI cost envelope a finance team trusts
A long-standing services firm wanted to know what AI would actually cost them over three years before the FD would sign off on anything more than a pilot.
What we'd ship
A three-year cost envelope modelling vendor spend, integration cost, governance overhead, and the avoided-headcount sensitivity. Paired with a governance memo and a 30/60/90 starting plan.
Timeline·Two-week strategy sprint with finance involved from day one
How the sprint runs
Four moves from ambiguity to a board-ready plan.
We do not pad. The sprint is short on purpose — short enough that the conversation does not lose momentum, structured enough that the output is defensible.
- Step 01Clarify commercial goals and constraints
We interview the board, the executive team, and the operating leads. Goals, constraints, and unspoken red lines get written down where everyone can read them.
- Step 02Audit workflows, data, and vendor exposure
We score each candidate workflow against value, risk, data quality, and integration cost. Vendor and model exposure is mapped explicitly.
- Step 03Decide build, buy, partner, defer
Each capability gets a recommendation with rationale. Defer is a valid answer; so is partner. We do not invent build-work to justify our presence.
- Step 04Sequence the first 30, 60, 90 days
The plan is paired with owners, gating decisions, and the measurement framework that tells you whether the sequence is working.
Strategy posture
How we differ from the big-firm AI strategy deck.
Length of engagement
Arkwright strategy sprint
One to two weeks for the core documents.
Typical management consulting deck
Six to twelve weeks with a large team.
Who writes the recommendation
Arkwright strategy sprint
The people who will also help deliver it.
Typical management consulting deck
Junior consultants handing off to a partner.
Vendor stance
Arkwright strategy sprint
Model and vendor agnostic. Conflicts disclosed.
Typical management consulting deck
Often coupled to a preferred implementation arm.
What survives the boardroom
Arkwright strategy sprint
A plan tied to operational evidence and named owners.
Typical management consulting deck
A future-state vision that loses contact with reality.
Axis
Arkwright strategy sprint
Typical management consulting deck
Length of engagement
One to two weeks for the core documents.
Six to twelve weeks with a large team.
Who writes the recommendation
The people who will also help deliver it.
Junior consultants handing off to a partner.
Vendor stance
Model and vendor agnostic. Conflicts disclosed.
Often coupled to a preferred implementation arm.
What survives the boardroom
A plan tied to operational evidence and named owners.
A future-state vision that loses contact with reality.
Questions boards and sponsors ask
Plain answers for serious rooms.
Next step
Scope a strategy sprint your board will sign off.
A 30-minute call is usually enough for us to tell you whether a strategy sprint is the right next move — or whether you need an opportunity audit first.